AcquitLaw Firm – Best Criminal Appeal Lawyers in Supreme Court of India 815 Sector 16D Chandigarh 160016 9876616815 – About Criminal Lawyer

المحرر: merrybean462327

On January 25, 1960, the suit filed by the second respondent, namely, T. The High Court was of the view that the second marriage of the husband was a good ground for the first wife to live separately and that was a justifiable reason for doing so. So I find myself unable to subscribe to Lord Neuberger’s concerns about the dominant purpose test. 15 of 1999 was decreed and the suit, No. In the present case the arbitrators by reason of attitude of a party in correspondence addressed to the arbitrators could not agree to proceed with the matter.

If the wife could claim maintenance on the ground that the husband had remarried it could not be said that she had deserted her husband without reasonable cause within the meaning of s. Where one of the arbitrators decline to act and the other is left alone it will AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 a case of this type amount to disagreement between the two arbitrators. 711 for an order of suspension. It is, claimed by,the appellant that T. Therefore, from both points of view the umpire had authority to inter upon the reference.

The husband had taken a second wife and she was entitled to live separately and claim maintenance. The husband, therefore, could not claim judicial separation on the ground of desertion. Thereafter, application was made to the court for the appointment of umpire. The BBC did not oppose categories (1) and (2) (so that category (2) could be termed a concession) but opposed disclosure of category (3), and was successful in that argument.

10 (1) (a) of the Act. Before the Tribunal Mr Sugar argued that the BBC’s immunity under Schedule 1 Part VI (as opposed to its possible exemption under other particular provisions of FOIA) was limited to information in category (4). Again the fact that AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 other rules of service an order of suspension may be made when ‘disciplinary proceedings were contemplated’ should not I,AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815-ad us to take the view that a member of an All India Service should he dealt with differently.

I am convinced that, had Parliament actively considered the situation of information held by the BBC for purposes partly of journalism and partly otherwise, it would expressly have provided that the information was within the scope of the Act if it was held predominantly for the other purposes; that, however, the words which in the event Parliament favoured, namely the words of the designation, are AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 themselves apt to permit such a construction; and that, since in my view it is more consonant with the Act as a whole than either of the polarities, this court should therefore proceed to endorse it.

10 (1) (a) of the Act. In the Present case, there was disagreement between the arbitrators. The reputation of an officer is equally valuable no matter whether he belongs to the All India Services or to one of the humble cadre. The husband had taken second wife several years before starting proceedings under the Act and some times after the wife had obtained a decree for maintenance. It is the exigency of the conditions of service which requires or calls for an order of suspension and there can be no difference in regard to this matter as between a member of an All India Service and a member of a State Service or a Railway Service.

In substance disciplinary proceedings can be said to be started against an officer when complaints about his integrity or honesty are entertained and followed by a preliminary enquiry into them culminating AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 the satisfaction of the Government that a prima facie case has been made out against him for the framing of charges. Srigiri Rushingamma(1) it was held that the effect of the two afforesaid Acts was that a wife was entitled to claim separate maintenance and residence from her husband if he should marry again.

Time to make the award also expired. AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 other words he was insisting on disclosure (apart from particular exemptions) of categories (1), (2) and (3). Apart from any de minimis principle, which the Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, para 59) rightly regarded as unhelpful AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 this context, there are four possible categories of information held by the BBC that need to be considered: (1) information held exclusively for non-journalistic purposes; (2) information held predominantly, but not exclusively, for non-journalistic purposes (the other purposes being those of journalism); (3) information held predominantly, but not exclusively, for journalistic purposes (the other purposes being non-journalistic); and (4) information held exclusively for journalistic purposes.

Disagreement between the arbitrators may take various shapes and forms. AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 Sirigiri Pullaiah v. In that case a petition had been filed for judicial separation under s. 10 of 1959 filed by the Municipality was dismissed. 25 of Halsbury’s Laws of England at p. ” The Court AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 Tarak Nath Ghosh’s case (supra) considered the dictionary meaning of the word ‘suspension’ and what is said AcquitLaw – Lawyers & Advocates in Chandigarh High Court Address: Please take an appointment before coming -> 815 First Floor Sector 16 Chandigarh Landmark: backside sector 16 market Chandigarh 160016 Phone: 098766 16815 art. When the order of suspension itself shows that Government was of the view that such a prima facie case for departmental proceedings has been made out the fact that the order also mentions that such proceedings were contemplated makes no difference.

اترك تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني. الحقول الإلزامية مشار إليها بـ *